Hormone-Induced Receptor Gene Splicing: Enhanced Expression of the Growth Factor Type I Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Motif in the Developing Mouse Ovary as a New Paradigm in Growth Regulation**This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Peptide NSY amide corresponding to residues 9–30 in the N-terminal part of the rat FSH-R1 was provided by Dr. J. Rivier under Contract NO1-HD-0–2906.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The acquisition of FSH receptor(s) during follicular growth and their coupling to signaling pathways are key events in follicular development and dominance. However, little is known about the precise nature of the FSH receptor(s) involved in the growth-promoting phases of hormone action. To investigate the hormonal regulation of a newly discovered, alternatively spliced, growth factor type 1 receptor (designated FSH-R3) for the hormone, we examined expression in the adult mouse and the effect of PMSG treatment in the immature mouse ovary. Using RT-PCR and primers based on the established sheep ovarian transcript, a part of the FSH-R3 message was amplified only in wild-type (+/+), but not in the FSH-R knockout (-/-), mouse ovary. Semiquantitative RT-PCR using 3'-end primers specific for FSH-R1 (G(s)-coupled) and FSH-R3 indicated expression levels of the latter to be higher when follicular growth was induced by PMSG. Using FSH-R3-specific peptide IgG, FSH-R3 protein was detected by Western blotting in extracts of adult mouse ovary and was localized in granulosa cell membrane of mature follicles. In the immature mouse, levels of FSH-R3 protein that increased after PMSG administration in a time-dependent manner were also localized only on granulosa cell membranes of large follicles. The results reveal for the first time the expression of a different growth-promoting receptor for FSH in the developing and cycling mouse ovary. These observations introduce a new paradigm in the control of ovarian function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".