Scripting and performing a drama about living with metastatic breast cancer provided insight into women’s experiences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sinding C, Gray R, Fitch M, et al. Staging breast cancer, rehearsing metastatic disease. Qual Health Res2002 Jan; 12 : 61 –73 [OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTION: What meanings were generated in women who scripted and performed a drama about living with metastatic breast cancer ( Handle with care? Living with metastatic breast cancer )? Hermeneutic phenomenology. A theatre school and drama centre for adults >50 years of age at a university in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2 women who had metastatic disease and took part in creating Handle with care? Living with metastatic breast cancer and 2 actors who had experienced a breast cancer diagnosis. The research team met with the theatre group and 2 women with metastatic breast cancer to create a drama based on a focus group study about living with metastatic breast cancer. People in the drama were interviewed at the beginning, midway through the creative process, and soon after the drama was taken on the road. A key question was: “What is it like for you to be involved in this process?” A phenomenological analysis focusing on the meanings of illness in the context of the drama was used. Drafts of the article were … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DQualitative%2BHealth%2BResearch%26rft.stitle%253DQual%2BHealth%2BRes%26rft.aulast%253DSinding%26rft.auinit1%253DC.%26rft.volume%253D12%26rft.issue%253D1%26rft.spage%253D61%26rft.epage%253D73%26rft.atitle%253DStaging%2BBreast%2BCancer%252C%2BRehearsing%2BMetastatic%2BDisease%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1177%252F104973230201200105%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F11797926%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/104973230201200105&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=11797926&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febnurs%2F5%2F4%2F127.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000172757700005&link_type=ISI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".