A Multiagent-Based Decision-Making System for Semiconductor Wafer Fabrication With Hard Temporal Constraints
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a decision-making system for semiconductor wafer fabrication facilities, or wafer fabs, with hard interoperation temporal constraints. The decision-making system is developed based on a multiagent architecture that is composed of scheduling agents, workcell agents, machine agents, and product agents. The decision-making problem is to allocate lots into each workcell to satisfy both logical and temporal constraints. A dynamic planning-based approach is adopted for the decision-making mechanism so that the dynamic behaviors of the wafer fab such as aperiodic lot arrivals and reconfiguration can be taken into consideration. The scheduling agents compute quasi-optimal schedules through a bidding mechanism with the workcell agents. The proposed decision-making mechanism uses a concept of temporal constraint sets to obtain a feasible schedule in polynomial steps. The computational complexity of the decision-making mechanism is proven to be, where is the number of operations of a lot and is the cardinality of the temporal constraint set.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it