MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102753387 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2007.435

P3A-6 Non-Invasive Micro-Vascular Ultrasound Elastography: Comparisons with M-Mode Strain Measurements in Rat Models of Hypertension

2007· article· en· W2102753387 on OpenAlexafffund
Roch L. Maurice, J. Fromageau, Ékatherina Stoyanova, Junzheng Peng, Pavel Hamet, Johanne Tremblay, Guy Cloutier

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings/Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElastographyStrain (injury)Artificial intelligenceUltrasoundComputer scienceBiomedical engineeringPhysicsMedicineInternal medicineAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Noninvasive micro-vascular ultrasound elastography (MicroNIVE) was recently proposed forinsituphenotyping in rat models of hypertension through the assessment of mechanical properties of carotid arteries. This paper reports comparisons between MicroNIVE and M-Mode strain measurements. Brown Norway male rats (n = 5) were investigated over 24 weeks. The common carotid arteries were imaged with an ultrasound biomicroscope equipped with a 40-MHz central frequency probe and an external workstation to collect radio-frequency (RF) data. Time-sequences of RF and M-mode signals were recorded over several consecutive cardiac cycles. MicroNIVE strain cartographies were computed for each pair of successive RF images with the Lagrangian Speckle Model Estimator. Diastolic strain (sD) and systolic strain (ss) parameters were estimated. M- mode strain estimations were computed as sM(t) = (w(t)-wmax)/wmax, with w(t) and wmaxbeing the wall thicknesses at time "t" and at end-diastole, respectively. MicroNIVE diastolic and systolic strains were consistent with a Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of 0.75 (p-11). M-mode and MicroNIVE strain measurements were correlated with r = 0.74 (p-5) between sMand sDand r = 0.67 (p-4) between sMand ss. Corroborated by Bland-Altman plots, M-mode and MicroNIVE were found in very good concordance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings/Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics SymposiumSame topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207