<i>trans</i> Autophosphorylation at DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase's Two Major Autophosphorylation Site Clusters Facilitates End Processing but Not End Joining
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies have established that DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) undergoes a series of autophosphorylation events that facilitate successful completion of nonhomologous DNA end joining. Autophosphorylation at sites in two distinct clusters regulates DNA end access to DNA end-processing factors and to other DNA repair pathways. Autophosphorylation within the kinase's activation loop regulates kinase activity. Additional autophosphorylation events (as yet undefined) occur that mediate kinase dissociation. Here we provide the first evidence that autophosphorylation within the two major clusters (regulating end access) occurs in trans. Further, both UV-induced and double-strand break (DSB)-induced phosphorylation in the two major clusters is predominantly autophosphorylation. Finally, we show that while autophosphorylation in trans on one of two synapsed DNA-PK complexes facilitates appropriate end processing, this is not sufficient to promote efficient end joining. This suggests that end joining in living cells requires additional phosphorylation events that either occur in cis or that occur on both sides of the DNA-PK synapse. These data support an emerging consensus that, via a series of autophosphorylation events, DNA-PK undergoes a sequence of conformational changes that promote efficient and appropriate repair of DSBs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it