Two Linked Blood Pressure Quantitative Trait Loci on Chromosome 10 Defined by Dahl Rat Congenic Strains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aquantitative trait locus (QTL) for blood pressure was previously detected on rat chromosome 10 (RNO10) by linkage analysis and confirmed by the construction of congenic strains that encompass large regions of RNO10. In the present study, the rat RNO10 blood pressure QTL was dissected by the further construction of congenic substrains. The original congenic region was shown to contain 2 blood pressure QTLs (QTL 1 and QTL 2) approximately 24 cM apart. These were localized to a <2.6-cM region between markers D10Rat27 and D10Rat24 for QTL 1 and to a <3.2-cM region between D10Rat12 and D10Mco70 for QTL 2. Comparative mapping suggests that the rat RNO10 QTL 2 could be localized very close to a blood pressure QTL described by sib-pair analysis on human chromosome 17, but this is not definitively established because of multiple and complex chromosomal rearrangements between rodents and humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".