MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102793931 · doi:10.1109/tasc.2009.2021575

Experimental Investigations on Nonlinear Properties of Superconducting Nanowire Meanderline in RF and Microwave Frequencies

2009· article· en· W2102793931 on OpenAlexaff
Zhizhong Yan, A. Hamed Majedi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAgilent Technologies
KeywordsKinetic inductanceInductanceNanowireMicrowaveMaterials scienceVoltageNonlinear systemCapacitanceSuperconductivityCondensed matter physicsScattering parametersBiasingEquivalent series resistancePhysicsOptoelectronicsOpticsElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report our experimental investigations on the radio frequency (RF) and microwave nonlinear behavior of the NbN nanowire meanderline. We construct a lumped element model of the NbN nanowire meanderline, which consists of a kinetic inductance, a normal resistance, and a parasitic capacitance that is a load of a transmission line. Two complementary measurements, which are based on the one-port scattering (S)-parameter technique, are used to explore the nonlinearity in the kinetic inductance and the normal resistance of the NbN nanowire meanderline under dc current and voltage bias conditions. In the first series of experiments, the kinetic inductance has directly been measured from zero up to 99% of the critical current and to the voltage bias, where the hotspot plateau occurs. The Ginsburg-Landau (G-L) theory has been employed to justify the results. The technical procedures required to achieve our desired level of accuracy have been described in detail. In the second series of experiments, the quality factor of the NbN nanowire meanderline has been measured, providing an alternative justification to the first experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Applied SuperconductivitySame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207