MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102805552 · doi:10.1149/2.007310jes

Microfluidic Reference Electrode with Free-Diffusion Liquid Junction

2013· article· en· W2102805552 on OpenAlexaff
Saeed Safari, P. Ravi Selvaganapathy, M. Jamal Deen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReference electrodeElectrodeMicrofluidicsAnalyteSilver chlorideMaterials scienceDiffusionElectrode potentialAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Glass electrodeOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyChemistryChromatographyElectrochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accuracy of many biological and chemical sensors is critically dependent on the stability of the potential imposed or sensed through a reference electrode. As these sensors are miniaturized, the reference electrode has to be miniaturized simultaneously without any loss to its stability. In this paper, we describe a new microfluidic miniaturized silver/silver chloride reference electrode that demonstrates significantly better stability and lifetime than conventional designs. In our new design, we have miniaturized the existing format of the macroscale reference electrode and added the capability to replenish the internal solution by integrating it with a microfluidic channel. The replenishment of the internal solution significantly improves the performance of these electrodes over other miniaturized designs. We demonstrate reference electrodes that are very stable (potential variation of <0.1 mV), with minimal drift (∼1 mV) and lifetimes longer than 100 hours. We have also characterized the behavior of these electrodes to changes in pH and chlorine concentration of the external solution. The results indicate insensitivity of the microfluidic reference electrode potential to the presence of any analyte in the test solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207