Is gamma loop dysfunction related to bilateral inhibition in anterior knee pain?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The potential relationship between bilateral quadriceps inhibition in individuals with unilateral anterior knee pain (AKP) and gamma loop dysfunction is examined in this study. METHODS: Twelve individuals with unilateral AKP and 10 healthy controls were recruited. Quadriceps voluntary activation (%VA) was quantified using a triggered interpolated twitch technique. Gamma loop function was assessed through knee extension maximum voluntary isometric contractions before and after 20 minutes of 50-Hz patellar tendon vibration. RESULTS: The AKP group exhibited 5.7% lower %VA bilaterally compared with controls (P = 0.039, Cohen d = 0.79). After prolonged vibration, both groups exhibited an average 8.5% reduction in knee extension force in each limb (P < 0.001, Cohen d = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Significant force reductions after vibration suggest that gamma loop dysfunction was not seen in either control or AKP participants. Bilateral quadriceps inhibition in the AKP group does not appear to be associated with gamma loop dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".