MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102894843 · doi:10.1016/j.sexol.2005.11.006

La professionnalisation de la sexologie au Québec

2006· article· fr· W2102894843 on OpenAlex
André Dupras

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSexologies · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSexologyProfessionalizationHumanitiesPolitical scienceInstitutionalisationAutonomySociologyGender studiesHuman sexualityPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le processus de professionnalisation de la sexologie au Québec est analysé selon la perspective de la sociologie des professions. L'élaboration et l'agencement de la pratique sexologique sont présentés à partir de six démarches stratégiques : l'identification de nouveaux besoins sexuels, la création de la sexologie comme nouvelle branche de la connaissance, l'institutionnalisation de la sexologie, la formation professionnelle des sexologues, l'acquisition d'une reconnaissance sociale, la formation d'une identité et d'une autonomie professionnelles. Selon une approche interactionniste, la sexologie s'est construite par les interactions qui se nouent entre les sexologues et les personnes concernées (surtout les universitaires et les usagers des services sexologiques). Le constat de l'acquisition de l'autonomie universitaire et du développement de l'organisation professionnelle permet de conclure que les stratégies des sexologues ont réussi, mais la professionnalisation de la sexologie n'est pas encore achevée. The process of professionalization of sexology in Quebec is analysed using the framework of sociology of professions. The elaboration and coordination of the practice of sexology are presented through six strategic steps: the identification of new sexual needs, the creation of sexology as a new branch of knowledge, the institutionalisation of sexology, the professional training of sexologists, the acquisition of a social reconnaissance, and the formation of a professional identity and autonomy. According to the interactionist approach, sexology built itself through the interactions bound between sexologists and concerned persons (namely the members of the university and the users of sexology services). The acquisition of graduate autonomy and the development of a professional organization allows one to assume that the above mentioned sexology strategies have succeeded, but the professionalization of sexology has not yet been accomplished.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.490
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.215
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it