Focusing and vertical mode scattering of the first mode internal tide by mesoscale eddy interaction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerical experiments are performed using the MITgcm to investigate the interaction of a mode‐one internal tide with barotropic and baroclinic mode‐one mesoscale eddies. Results show that after a mode‐one internal tide passes through a barotropic eddy, spatial hot and cold spots of energy flux are produced in beam‐like patterns. The magnitude of the energy flux in the hot spots can exceed twice the incident flux while in the cold spots can reach nearly zero. Passing a mode‐one internal tide through a mode‐one baroclinic eddy results in the scattering of energy from the incident mode‐one to modes two and higher. The higher mode waves are produced in beam‐like patterns. For the parameter regime explored here, we find conversion efficiencies that reach 13% for eddies of diameter 120 km. The Rossby numbers for our experiments are order one, corresponding to energetic mesoscale eddies that are typically found in western boundary current extensions and in the southern ocean. These eddies have length scales comparable to those of low‐mode internal tides, and we expect that interaction between the two will be easily formed in locations where these phenomena coexist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it