MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102975010 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2008.0521

The fracture behaviour of functionally graded piezoelectric materials containing collinear dielectric cracks

2009· article· en· W2102975010 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDielectricMaterials sciencePiezoelectricityFracture (geology)Chebyshev polynomialsComposite materialSingular integralBoundary value problemDeformation (meteorology)Boundary (topology)MechanicsGeometryIntegral equationMathematical analysisMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the problem of two collinear cracks in functionally graded piezoelectric materials (FGPMs) under in-plane electromechanical loads is examined. The elastic, piezoelectric and dielectric constants of the FGPMs are assumed to vary continuously in space. The theoretical formulations are derived by using Fourier transforms and the resulting singular integral equations are solved with Chebyshev polynomials. A dielectric crack model with deformation-dependent electric boundary condition is adopted in the fracture analysis of FGPMs. Numerical simulations are made to show the effect of the dielectric medium, the material gradient and the geometry of interacting cracks upon the fracture parameters at crack tips. A critical state for applied electromechanical loading is identified, which determines whether the traditionally impermeable (or permeable) crack model serves as the upper or lower bound of the current dielectric crack model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it