MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102993869

Bio-healing for micro-crack treatment in cementitious materials: Toward a quantitative assessment of bacterial efficiency

2013· article· en· W2102993869 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Repository (Delft University of Technology) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Applications in Construction Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelf-healingMortarCementitiousMaterials scienceExpansiveCrackingComposite materialCementCompressive strengthMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bio-healing is a promising approach to enhancing natural self-healing and thus completely heal large micro-cracks (> 200 ?m) in cementitious materials. The aim of this research is to better understand bio-healing of cementitious materials in order to accelerate the healing kinetics and maximize sealing efficiency of large micro-cracks. The bio-healing approach generally consists in soaking micro-cracks in a culture medium containing a bacterial strain. However, it is difficult to precisely assess the efficiency of the bacterial-mediated precipitation in the bio-healing process with respect to the impacts of natural self-healing and precipitation induced by the culture medium. The aim of this work is to study the healing of well-defined micro-cracks on mortars subjected to more and more complex healing mechanisms. First, cracked mortars were subjected to natural self-healing, then to a precursor solution (calcium lactate), and finally, to a culture medium containing a bacterial strain. However, before this last step, an important part of this study focused on assessing the growth kinetics of a bacterial strain: Bacillus cohnii. Mortars specimens (W/C = 0.485) were submitted to controlled cracking at 28 days (under sustained load) using a mechanical expansive core. Two micro-crack categories were created (100 ± 5 ?m and 195 ± 30 ?m). The healing kinetics was evaluated from air-flow measurements that were used to compute the evolution, over time, of the apparent crack opening (1, 3 and 6 months of conservation at 23°C and 100% R.H.) Overall, self-healing was faster and more complete when cracks were soaked in calcium lactate solutions compared to natural healing. Thus, precursor solutions significantly improved the healing kinetics of the larger micro-cracks (> 150 ?m). On the other hand, the optimum growth conditions for Bacillus cohnii were evaluated at different nutrient concentrations and pH values. Finally, a method was developed in order to evaluate the bacterial activity semi-quantitatively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it