The Winter Walkability Project: Occupational Therapists' Role in Promoting Citizen Engagement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Walkability is one feature of a person-friendly community that citizen engagement can influence. PURPOSE: Describe a winter walkability project and how an occupational therapist supported citizen engagement and participation in local policy decision making. METHODS: Seven stakeholder representatives undertook a participatory research project to address winter walkability. Through focus groups and walking logs, 10 citizens provided feedback on barriers to winter walking and a new sidewalk snow-clearing method. Analysis ascertained factors contributing to winter sidewalk walkability and factors promoting citizen engagement. FINDINGS: Results identified reasons for and barriers to walking, perceived reasons for sidewalk conditions, and perceived effectiveness of the snow-clearing intervention. Citizens recommended against using the new snow-clearing method. Factors promoting citizen engagement included individual actions producing nominal results, individual and community-level interest, and development as citizen-experts. IMPLICATIONS This project provides one example of how occupational therapists can take a sociopolitical role and facilitate citizen and occupational engagement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".