Oxytocin in the Heart Regeneration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have demonstrated that entire oxytocin (OT) system is synthesized in the rat and human heart and this hormone is implicated in several cardiac functions including stem cells differentiation into cardiomyocytes. These observations led us to the invention of OT as an inducer of cardiomyogenesis (US20060205636A1). We also proposed the use of OT, its functional derivatives, and/or physiological precursors as well as nucleic acids capable of encoding OT as cell-differentiating and useful agents for treating or preventing diseases, such as heart diseases associated with loss of cardiomyocytes. The invention is relevant to the use of OT or OT-related compounds. OT is claimed as an inducer that promotes the differentiation of non-cardiomyocytes (e.g. stem/progenitor cells) in situ, which can be used to repair, restore or fortify damaged cardiac tissue or in cell culture in order to provide material for cell or tissue grafting in the heart. Recent reports documented the significant progress in the research on the role of OT in cardiovascular regulation. Most of the results are consistent with the postulated cardioprotective role of OT. In this review, new data are discussed in the context of the main points presented in the invention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".