MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103061039 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2004.1370643

Monitoring crop biomass accumulation using multi-temporal hyperspectral remote sensing data

2004· article· en· W2103061039 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingEnvironmental scienceCropBiomass (ecology)Growing seasonRemote sensingLeaf area indexContext (archaeology)Crop yieldAgronomyVegetation (pathology)Normalized Difference Vegetation IndexGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The estimation of the above-ground dry phytomass accumulation is important for monitoring crop growth, predicting potential yield, and estimating crop residues in the context of the carbon cycle. Hyperspectral remote sensing has been proven to be a very effective tool for the estimation of crop variables such as LAI, pigment and water content; therefore it is reasonable to expect that data from hyperspectral remote sensing can show great potential for monitoring crop biomass accumulation, either directly or indirectly through other variables. The objective of this study is to investigate the relationships between optical indices and either crop dry mass or height using multi-temporal, multi-field hyperspectral data. Using the Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager (CASI), hyperspectral data were acquired in three deployments during the 2001 growing season over corn, soybean and wheat fields in the former Greenbelt Farm of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada in Ottawa. High correlation was observed between the measured above-ground crop dry biomass and the other two parameters, crop height and leaf area index (LAI). The vegetation index MTVI2, calculated from hyperspectral images, was used to estimate the accumulated absorbed photo-synthetically active radiation (APAR) for the monitoring of crop biomass production. Both dry biomass and crop height were highly correlated with the accumulated APAR. For all the samples from the three dates, the coefficient of determination (R/sup 2/) between the estimated APAR and crop dry mass was 0.95, 0.99 and 0.76, and R/sup 2/ between the estimated APAR and crop height was 0.90, 0.89 and 0.70 for corn, soybean and wheat, respectively. However, further analysis shows that the correlation between biomass increment and the accumulated APAR during a short period of time is much lower for wheat. This demonstrates that apart from APAR, biomass accumulation is affected by other factors as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207