NiMo/alumina hydrodesulphurization catalyst modified by saccharose: Effect of addition stage of organic modifier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
NiMo/Al 2 O 3 catalysts, obtained by one‐pot simultaneous impregnation, were modified by saccharose (SA, at Ni/SA = 1 mol ratio) addition. To address the influence of stage of saccharide impregnation on the hydrodesulphurization activity of sulphided catalysts, three different preparation methodologies were followed: (a) modification of already calcined (400 °C) NiMo/Al 2 O 3 by SA impregnation; (b) SA deposition directly onto the alumina support, prior to Ni + Mo impregnation; (c) simultaneous Ni + Mo + SA deposition. Materials were characterized by N 2 physisorption, X‐ray diffraction, infrared (IR) spectroscopy, UV‐vis spectroscopy, and temperature‐programmed reduction (TPR), and tested on liquid‐phase dibenzothiophene (DBT) conversion (batch reactor, T = 320 °C, P = 7.2 MPa, n ‐hexadecane as solvent). The last methodology resulted in the catalyst with the highest DBT hydrodesulphurization (HDS) activity, on a pseudo‐first order kinetic constant basis. A decreased proportion of tetrahedral Mo 6+ species due to diminished interaction with the carrier, increased reducibility of octahedral Mo 6+ , and Ni complexation as well seemed to play determining roles in the trends of the activity observed. Simultaneous saccharose addition during NiMo phase impregnation required no additional preparation steps to efficiently integrate the organic modifier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".