MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103113479 · doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2025554

Precoding for the AWGN Channel With Discrete Interference

2009· article· en· W2103113479 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Farmanbar, Amir K. Khandani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmphasis (telecommunications)MathematicsChannel (broadcasting)PrecodingCombinatoricsComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a state-dependent discrete memoryless channel with input alphabet${\cal X}$, state alphabet${\cal S}$, and output alphabet${\cal Y}$where the independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) state sequence is known causally at the transmitter, it is shown that by using at most$\min \{\vert{\cal X}\vert \vert{\cal S}\vert -\vert{\cal S}\vert +1,\vert{\cal Y}\vert \}$out of$\vert{\cal X}\vert^{\vert{\cal S}\vert}$inputs of the Shannon's derived channel, the capacity is achievable. As an example of state-dependent channels with side information at the transmitter,$M$-ary signal transmission for the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel with additive$Q$-ary interference where the sequence of i.i.d. interference symbols is known causally at the transmitter is considered. The optimal precoding scheme is derived under the constraint that the channel input given any current interference symbol is uniformly distributed over the channel input alphabet. It is shown that at low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) not doing precoding is optimal. For the special case where the Gaussian noise power is zero, it is shown that the rate$\log_2 M$is achievable by a one-shot coding scheme if${\cal X}$is an arithmetic progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information TheorySame topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207