Effect of the dispersed phase fraction on particle size in blends with high viscosity ratio
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract It has been reported that for polymer blends with high viscosity ratio (>1), the size of the dispersed particles decreases with increasing volume fraction of the dispersed phase. In order to explain this effect, an equation was derived for the affine deformation of an imaginary plane of the dispersed phase in stratified two‐phase steady, simple, shear flow. The model predicts that for viscosity ratio >1, the deformation rate increases with volume fraction of the dispersed phase, and the shear stress also increases, leading to an increase of the breakup time. Therefore, the total deformation of the dispersed phase, before breakup, increases with increase of volume fraction, resulting in a decrease of the size of the dispersed phase particles. Accordingly, one can expect that in industrial mixers, the particle size of the blends should decrease as the volume fraction increases, if coalescence is suppressed. Experiments were carried out in a Haake batch mixer, using polyethylene/polyamide‐6 blends compatibilized by adding maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene. Particle size decreased up to 20 wt% polyamide‐6, at 100, 150, and 200 RPM, and increased between 20 and 30 wt%. The decrease of the particle size is mainly due to increased deformation of the dispersed phase. The increase of the particle size above 20 wt% is due to coalescence at high fractions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it