Evidence that the <i>Campylobacter fetus sap</i> Locus Is an Ancient Genomic Constituent with Origins before Mammals and Reptiles Diverged
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Campylobacter fetus bacteria, isolated from both mammals and reptiles, may be either subsp. fetus or subsp. venerealis and either serotype A or serotype B. Surface layer proteins, expressed and secreted by genes in the sap locus, play an important role in C. fetus virulence. To assess whether the sap locus represents a pathogenicity island and to gain further insights into C. fetus evolution, we examined several C. fetus genes in 18 isolates. All of the isolates had 5 to 9 sapA or sapB homologs. One strain (85-387) possessed both sapA and sapB homologs, suggesting a recombinational event in the sap locus between sapA and sapB strains. When we amplified and analyzed nucleotide sequences from portions of housekeeping gene recA (501 bp) and sapD (450 bp), a part of the 6-kb sap invertible element, the phylogenies of the genes were highly parallel. Among the 15 isolates from mammals, serotype A and serotype B strains generally had consistent positions. The fact that the serotype A C. fetus subsp. fetus and subsp. venerealis strains were on the same branch suggests that their differentiation occurred after the type A-type B split. Isolates from mammals and reptiles formed two distinct tight phylogenetic clusters that were well separated. Sequence analysis of 16S rRNA showed that the reptile strains form a distinct phylotype between mammalian C. fetus and Campylobacter hyointestinalis. The phylogenies and sequence results showing that sapD and recA have similar G + C contents and substitution rates suggest that the sap locus is not a pathogenicity island but rather is an ancient constituent of the C. fetus genome, integral to its biology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".