STRONGLY CLEAN MATRICES OVER COMMUTATIVE LOCAL RINGS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An element of a ring is called strongly clean provided that it can be written as the sum of an idempotent and a unit that commute. We characterize, in this paper, the strongly cleanness of matrices over commutative local rings. This partially extend many known results such as Theorem 12 in Borooah, Diesl and Dorsey [Strongly clean matrix rings over commutative local rings, J. Pure Appl. Algebra212 (2008) 281–296], Theorem 3.2.7 and Proposition 3.3.6 in Dorsey [Cleanness and strong cleanness of rings of matrices, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley (2006)], Theorem 2.3.14 in Fan [Algebraic analysis of some strongly clean and their generalization, Ph.D. thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland (2009)], Theorem 3.1.9 and Theorem 3.1.26 in Yang [Strongly clean rings and g(x)-clean rings, Ph.D. thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland (2007)].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it