MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103147240 · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp145

Genes within Genes: Multiple LAGLIDADG Homing Endonucleases Target the Ribosomal Protein S3 Gene Encoded within an rnl Group I Intron of Ophiostoma and Related Taxa

2009· article· en· W2103147240 on OpenAlexafffund
Jyothi Sethuraman, Anna Majer, Nancy C. Friedrich, David R. Edgell, Georg Hausner

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Biology and Evolution · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyHoming endonucleaseGeneGeneticsIntronRibosomal proteinCoding regionMolecular biologyRNARibosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In some ascomycete fungi, ribosomal protein S3 (Rps3) is encoded within a group I intron (mL2449) that is inserted in the U11 region of the mitochondrial large subunit rDNA (rnl) gene. Previous characterization of the mL2449 intron in strains of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi subspecies americana (Dutch Elm Disease) revealed a complex genes-within-genes arrangement whereby a LAGLIDADG homing endonuclease gene (HEG) is inserted into the RPS3 gene near the 3' terminus, creating a hybrid Rps3-LAGLIDADG fusion protein. Here, we examined 119 additional strains of Ophiostoma and related taxa representing 85 different species by a polymerase chain reaction- based survey and detected both short (approximately 1.6 kb) and long (>2.2 kb) versions of the mL2449 intron in 88 and 31 strains, respectively. Among the long versions encountered, 21 were sequenced, revealing the presence of either intact or degenerated HEG-coding regions inserted within the RPS3 gene. Surprisingly, we identified two new HEG insertion sites in RPS3; one near the original C-terminal insertion site and one near the N-terminus of RPS3. In all instances, the HEGs are fused in-frame with the RPS3-coding sequences to create fusion proteins. However, comparative sequence analysis showed that upon insertion, the HEGs displaced a portion of the RPS3-coding region. Remarkably, the displaced RPS3-coding segments are duplicated and fused in-frame to the 3' end of RPS3, restoring a full-length RPS3 gene. We cloned and expressed the LAGLIDADG portion of two Rps3-HEG fusions, and showed that I-OnuI and I-LtrI generate 4 nucleotide (nt), 3' overhangs, and cleave at or 1 nt upstream of the HEG insertion site, respectively. Collectively, our data indicate that RPS3 genes are a refuge for distinct types of LAGLIDADG HEGs that are defined by the presence of duplicated segments of the host gene that restore the RPS3 gene, thus minimizing the impact of the HEG insertion on Rps3 function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Biology and EvolutionSame topicForest Insect Ecology and ManagementFrench-language works237,207