Bibliographic record
Abstract
MODALITY Smullyan, A F, Modality and Description, Journal of Symbolic Logic 13 [1948] Myhill, John, Problems Arising in the Formalization of Intentional Logic, Logique et Analyse I [1958] Wilson, N L, Modality and Identity, Journal of Philosophy, 62 [1965] Sleigh, Robert,Jr, A Note on an Argument of Quine's, Philosophical Studies 17 [1966] Burge, Tyler, Kaplan, Quine and suspended Belief, Philosophical Studies 31 [1977] Church, Alonzo, A Remark concerning Quine's Paradox and Modality, In Nathan Salmon and Scott Soames, eds., Propositions and Attitudes [Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1988] SINGULAR TERMS Wilson, Neil L, Property Designation and Description, Philosophical Review 64 [1955] Strawson, P F, Singular Terms and Predication, Journal of Philosophy 58 [1961] Loar, Brian, Reference and Propositional Attitudes, Philosophical Review 81 [1972] Linsky, Leonard, Quine on Quantifying in, Journal of Philosophy 66 [1969] Hornsby, Jennifer, Singular Terms in Contexts of Propositional Attitude, Mind 86 [1977] IDENTITY Evans, Gareth, Identity and predication, Journal of Philosophy 72 [1975] PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS Parsons, Charles, Ontology and Mathematics, Philosophical Review 80 [1971] LOGIC Leblanc, Hughes, Commentary on W V Quine's Free Logic, description and Virtual Clases, Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 36 [1977] SURPRISE EXAM Ayer, A J, On A Supposed Antinomy, Mind 82 [1973] Bennett, Johnathan, Review of Several Papers on the Surprise Exam, Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 [1965] NEW FOUNDATION (1937) Boffa, M, Sets Equipollent to their power set in NF, Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 [1975] Boffa, M, The Consistency Problem for NF, Journal of Symbolic Logic 42 [1977] Boffa, M, ZFJ and the Consistency Problem for NF, Jahrbuch der Kurt Goedel Gesselschaft [1988] Crabbe, M, On the Consistency of an Imprecicative Subsytem of Quine's NF, Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 [1982] Crabbe, M, The Hauptsatz for Stratified Comprehension: A Semantic Proof, Mathematical Logic Quarterly 40 [1994] Crabbe, M, On NFU, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33 [1992] Dzierzgowski, Daniel, Models of Intuitionistic TT and NF, Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 [1995] Forster, Thomas, Quine's NF 60 years on, American Mathematical Monthly 104 [November 1997] Forster, Thomas, Term Models for weak Set Theories with a Universal Set, Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 [1987] Forster, Thomas and Kaye, End extensions preserving power set, Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 [1991] Grishin, V N, Consistency of a Fragment of Quine's NF System
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".