Multifocal Venous Malformations: Two Interesting Case Presentations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Multiple venous abnormalities involving the orbit, head and neck regions have been previously described. We present two similar cases of low-flow orbital venous vascular malformations (VVMs) in association with multiple low-flow VVMs in the head and neck as well as in the peripheral limb. Literature search revealed that this association has not been previously reported. METHODS: Retrospective review of two patients with multifocal VVMs was performed. RESULTS: Case 1: A 46 year-old Chinese female had a history of multiple vascular lesions involving the right orbit, the tongue, right neck region, right arm and one finger. Valsalva manoeuvre resulted in distension of these lesions. CT scan of the orbits demonstrated bilateral low-flow VVMs. CT angiogram also revealed multiple developmental venous anomalies in the brain. Case 2: A 16 year-old Chinese female had a history of multiple venous malformations involving the neck, left forearm and oral region. Dynamic manoeuvres demonstrated the distensible nature of these lesions. MRI scans of the orbits showed bilateral extraconal low-flow VVMs. Similar mass lesions were seen on MRI scans of the neck. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple cervicofacial venous malformations with developmental abnormalities of the intracranial venous system have been described previously. However, their associations with similar VVMs in the peripheral limb regions have not been reported. Our cases illustrate this rare association. VVMs appear to be benign in nature with symptoms mainly due to mass effect. Management can be conservative in the absence of any sight threatening complication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it