MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2103213547 · doi:10.1016/s1637-5017(19)30271-6

10.1016/s1637-5017(19)30271-6

2000· article· en· W2103213547 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyMedicineLong QT syndromeQT intervalInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le syndrome du QTlong congenital (SQTL), cliniquement et genetiquement heterogene, est caracterise par un allongement de l’intervalle QT sur l’electrocardiogramme (ECG), associe a un risque de troubles du rythme ventriculaire graves (torsades de pointes ou TdP, fibrillation ventriculaire) pouvant entrainer syncopes et mort subite. Six genes pouvant etre responsables du SQTL ont ete jusqu’a present identifies. Ils codent dans la majorite des cas pour des sous‐unites de canaux sodiques ou potassiques : deux sous‐unites α de canaux potassiques ( KCNQ1 pour LQT1, KCNH2 pour LQT2), la sous‐unite α du canal sodique ( SCN5A pour LQT3), deux sous‐unites regulatrices de canaux potassiques ( KCNE1 pour LQT5 regulant KCNQ1 et KCNE2 regulant KCNH2). Des mutations dans le gene de l’ankyrine B sont associees a la forme LQT4. La gravite potentielle du pronostic justifie un depistage des sujets atteints par un ECG et un enregistrement Holter. Afin d’identifier les sujets a risque d’evenement cardiaque, ces examens associes a une recherche genetique doivent etre effectues chez les membres de la famille directe. Le defi majeur reste l’appreciation du risque de mort subite, chez un sujet encore asymptomatique. Le traitement, sauf cas particulier, repose sur la prescription de betabloquants et l’eviction des medicaments connus pour favoriser les TdP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0070.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9800.987

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knit→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→