The Influence of Temperature - Food Availability on the Tissue Growth of Sea Scallop Placopecten magellanicus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studi terhadap pertumbuhan kerang simping Placopecten magellanicus, yang dibudidayakan dengan metode “suspended culture” telah dilakukan selama tujuh bulan di lokasi budidaya di Graves Shoal, Mahone Bay, Nova Scotia, Kanada. Benih scallop muda dipelihara dalam pearl nets dengan kepadatan 30-35 ekor dan ditempatkan pada empat lokasi yang mewakili perairan permukaan (7 m), dasar perairan (14 m), di luar lokasi budidaya (outer edge), di tengah-tengah lokasi budidaya (centre). Pertumbuhan jaringan lunak (whole tissue weight) diamati setiap bulan sekali. Monitoring terhadap suhu dan ketersediaan pakan pada permukaan dan dasar perairan juga dilakukan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat pertumbuhan pada jaringan lunak lebih besar di permukaan perairan dibandingkan dengan di dasar perairan, tetapi tidak ada perbedaan nyata antara antara pertumbuhan di luar lokasi budidaya dengan di lokasi budidaya. Pertumbuhan jaringan lunak sendiri tidak ada korelasinya dengan suhu dan ketersediaan pakan di perairan. Kata kunci : suhu, ketersediaan pakan, berat total jaringan lunak, kerang simping A study of the growth of the sea scallop, Placopecten magellanicus , under suspended culture conditions was carried out over a seven month period at a culture site in Graves Shoal, Mahone Bay,Nova Scotia – Canada. Scallop spat were cultivated in pearl nets at a density of 30-35 per net set at four locations corresponding to the surface (7 m) and bottom (14 m) at the outer edge and the center of the site. Whole tissue weight was measured at monthly intervals. Environmental conditions represented as temperature and food availability at the surface and bottom over the same period were also monitored. The result showed that the mean values of whole tissue weight at the surface sites were greater than that at the bottom sites, but there were not significantly different between the outside sites and the inside sites. Growth in whole tissue weight was not to correlate to temperature - food availability. Key words : temperature, food availability, whole tissue weight, sea scallop
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".