HIV dementia patients exhibit reduced viral neutralization and increased envelope sequence diversity in blood and brain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between the humoral immune response and viral envelope diversity among HIV/AIDS patients with or without HIV-associated dementia (HAD). METHODS: Whole blood and sera were collected from age- and disease-progression matched AIDS-defined patients with and without neuro-cognitive impairment at two centers. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from whole blood and separated into monocyte/macrophage and peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) preparations. Genomic DNA, isolated from the PBL population, was used as template to amplify HIV-1 C2V3 envelope sequences in a nested PCR protocol. The resulting fragments were sequenced and subjected to a phylogenetic analysis. RESULTS: Sera from non-demented (ND; n = 21) patients neutralized infection of CCR5-dependent, but not CXCR4-dependent viruses, more efficiently than sera from HAD patients (n = 15) (P < 0.05). A recombinant virus containing a brain derived C2V3 sequence was also neutralized less efficiently by sera from HAD patients ( < 0.05). C2V3 envelope sequences amplified from PBL revealed significantly greater diversity within the V3 region from HAD compared with ND patients (P < 0.001). The number of non-synonymous substitutions was positively correlated with the severity of neuro-cognitive impairment of patients (P < 0.005). Similarly, brain derived V3 sequences exhibited significantly increased diversity among HAD patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings imply that HAD patients exhibited impaired serological responses that may lead to the emergence of viral mutants that potentially could infect the brain and mediate neurodegeneration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".