Multi-Fequency, Pulse-to-pulse Coherent Doppler Sonar Profiler
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under ideal conditions, pulse-to-pulse coherent Doppler sonar can measure profiles of water velocity with unparalleled accuracy and resolution. However, this technique is limited in application by the occurrence of range and, more critically, speed ambiguities. A simple way to deal with speed ambiguities is to invert velocities using time history or prior knowledge of the flow structure, but these approaches are not always practical or reliable. Another technique is the use of a dual (or multiple) pulse repetition interval: this approach provides a reliable means of improvement but reduces the profile sample rate, and the pulse repetition interval is not always a free parameter (for example in the presence of a boundary). We present a new approach where multiple acoustic frequencies are used simultaneously, allowing a nearly five-fold increase in ambiguity velocity with no reduction in profile sample rate. Results are presented from a prototype multi-static system operating over the frequency range from 1.2 to 2.4 MHz, enabled in part through use of broad-band piezo-composite transducers. The prototype system generates two-component velocity profiles at a rate of 150 profiles/second over a 30 cm range interval with 3 mm range resolution. System performance is demonstrated under laboratory conditions with observations of flow in a turbulent jet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it