Electrical Stimulation and Neuroprostheses for Restoring Swallowing Function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessPerspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia)Article1 Jun 2004Electrical Stimulation and Neuroprostheses for Restoring Swallowing Function T. Adam Thrasher and Milos R. Popovic T. Adam Thrasher Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteToronto, Ontario, Canada Google Scholar More articles by this author and Milos R. Popovic University of TorontoToronto, Ontario, Canada Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/sasd13.2.28 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Adams M. E., Takes V., Popovic M. R., Bulsen A., & Zivanovic V. (2003, July). Restoration of grasping functions in patients with quadriplegia..Proceedings of IFESS 2003, Maroochydore, Australia: International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society. Google Scholar Burnett, T. A., Mann, E. A., Cornell, S. A., Ludlow, C. L. (2003). Laryngeal elevation achieved by neuromuscular stimulation at rest..Journal of Applied Physiology, 94, 128–134. Google Scholar Fraser, C., Power, M., Hamdy, S., Rothwell, J., Hobday, D., Hollander, I., Tyrell, P., Hobson, A., Williams, S., & Thompson, D. (2002). Driving plasticity in human adult motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury..Neuron, 34(5), 831–840. Google Scholar Freed, M. L., Freed, L., Chatburn, R. L., & Christian, M. (2001). Electrical stimulation for swallowing disorders caused by stroke..Respiratory Care, 46(5), 466–474. Google Scholar Graupe, D., Davis, R., Kordylewski, H., & Kohn, K.H. (1998). Ambulation by traumatic T 4–12 paraplegics using functional neuromuscular stimulation..Reviews in Neurosurgery, 8, 221–231. Google Scholar Grill W. M., Craggs M. D., Foreman R. D., Ludlow C. L., & Buller J. L. (2001). Emerging clinical applications of electrical stimulation: Opportunities for restoration of function..Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 38(6), 641–653. Google Scholar Gstoettner, W., Adunka, O., Hamzavi, J., & Baumgartner, W.D. (2000). Rehabilitation of hearing-impaired patients with cochlear implants, a review..Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 112(11), 464–472. Google Scholar Higgins, K. M., Chen, J. M., Nedzelski, J. M., Shipp, D. B., & McIlmoyl, L. D. (2002). A matched-pair comparison of two cochlear implant systems..Journal of Otolaryngology, 31 (2), 97–105. Google Scholar Ijzerman, M., Stoffers, T., Groen, F., Klatte, M., Snoek, G., Vorsteveld, J., Nathan, R., & Hermens, H. (1996). The NESS handmaster orthosis: Restoration of hand function in C5 and stroke patients by means of electrical stimulation..Journal of Rehabilitation Science, 9(3), 86–89. Google Scholar Lazzarra, G., Lazarus, C., & Logemann, J. A. (1986) Impact of thermal stimulation on the triggering of the swallowing reflex..Dysphagia, 1, 73–77. Google Scholar Leelamanit, V., Limsakul, C., & Geater, A. (2002). Synchronized electrical stimulation in treating pharyngeal dysphagia..Laryngoscope, 112, 2204–2210. Google Scholar Lenarz, T. (1998). Cochlear implants, selection criteria and shifting borders..Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica Belgica, 52(3), 183–199. Google Scholar Loeb, G. E. (2002). Presentation highlights: Bionic neurons (BIONs™)..Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 39(3) (Supplement), 5–6. Google Scholar Park, C. L., O’Neill, P. A., & Martin, D. F. (1997). A pilot exploratory study of oral electrical stimulation on swallow function following stroke: An innovative technique..Dysphagia. 12, 161–166. Google Scholar Rijkhoff, N. J. M., Wijkstra, H., van Kerrebroeck, P. E. V., & Debruyne, F. M. J. (1997). Urinary bladder control by electrical stimulation: Review of electrical stimulation techniques in spinal cord injury..Neurourology and Urodynamics, 16, 39–53. Google Scholar Rushton, D. N. (2003). Functional electrical stimulation and rehabilitation— A hypothesis.. Engineering and Physics, 25(1), 75–78. Google Scholar Schurch, B., Rodic, B., & Jeanmonod, D. (1997). Posterior sacral rhizotomy and intradural anterior sacral root stimulation for treatment of the spastic bladder in spinal cord injured patients..Journal of Urology, 157, 610–614. Google Scholar Smith, B., Peckham, P., Keith, M., & Roscoe, D. (1987). An externally powered, multichannel, implantable stimulator for versatile control of paralyzed muscle..IEEE Transactions on Biomechanical Engineering, 34, 499–508. Google Scholar Taylor, P. N., Burridge, J. H., Dunkerley, A. L., Wood, D. E., Norton, J. A., Singleton, C., & Swain, I.D. (1999). Clinical use of the Odstock Dropped Foot Stimulator: Its effect on speed and effort of walking..Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 1577–1583. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 13Issue 2June 2004Pages: 28-31 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Jun 1, 2004 Metrics Downloaded 19 times Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesasha-sigsCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2004 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".