Does intrusive growth of fusiform initials really contribute to circumferential growth of vascular cambium?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Currently it is believed that intrusive growth of fusiform cambial initials adds to the circumference of the cambial cylinder: the initial cells multiplied by anticlinal divisions are produced in excess, and the excess cells are later eliminated from the cambial surface. The present study, dealing with the intrusive growth of fusiform initials in the cambium of Laburnum anagyroides Medik, suggests that addition of a radial file of initials owing to intrusive growth, or elimination of any such file, has no visible effect on the tangential dimensions of a given cambial sector, and that intrusive growth of fusiform initials and the elimination of excess initials occur in unison. The two events complement each other, and the gain in size of the growing fusiform cell is accompanied by a reduction in size of its neighbour cell, thus keeping the tangential dimensions of the cambium unchanged. Our findings on L. anagyroides find support from illustrations of previous studies, which we have re-examined and re-interpreted. Our data suggest that increase in the cambial circumference is largely due to the symplastic growth of the fusiform initials in tangential direction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".