Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenueGlobal Education Review (Mercy College, New York) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman auditory perception and evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCollege at Brockport, State University of New YorkUniversity of California, Los AngelesState University of New York at New PaltzUniversität RostockUniversity of ThessalyErzincan ÜniversitesiMadurai Kamaraj UniversityUniversität SalzburgUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Hong KongConcordia UniversityDurham UniversityUniversity of WarwickUniversity of ExeterUniversity of CyprusIllinois State UniversityKent State UniversityDuquesne UniversityAlpen-Adria-Universität KlagenfurtAppalachian State UniversityGeorgia State UniversityWest Virginia UniversityUniversity of MontanaClaremont Graduate UniversityCalifornia State Polytechnic University, PomonaUniversity at BuffaloUniversity of RochesterUniversity of OtagoSorbonne UniversitéRTI InternationalLouisiana State UniversityUniversity of OklahomaAristotle University of ThessalonikiUniversity of CambridgeVictoria UniversitySyracuse UniversityUniversity of PittsburghJames Cook UniversitySt. John's UniversityJames Madison UniversityTata Institute of Social SciencesFlorida International UniversityUniversity of ConnecticutUniversität WienUniversity of Northern ColoradoMcGill UniversityDurban University of TechnologyQueens College, City University of New YorkUniversity of MissouriMichigan State UniversityUniversity of CincinnatiMississippi State UniversityUniversity of GlasgowUniversity of East LondonGeorge Mason UniversityLoyola University ChicagoCentral Connecticut State UniversityUniversity of CanterburyUniversity of TorontoPortland State UniversityUniversity of Texas at San AntonioUniversity of LouisvilleSouthern Methodist UniversityCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversity of ToledoBinghamton UniversitySan Diego State UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaGeorge Washington UniversityAdelphi UniversityVanderbilt UniversityLOEWE Zentrum AdRIAUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonPurdue University
KeywordsSociologyPolitical scienceBusiness
DOInot available
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno