MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103574523 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020662

The WEBT BL Lacertae Campaign 2000

2002· article· en· W2103574523 on OpenAlex
M. Villata, C. M. Raiteri, O. M. Kurtanidze, M. G. Nikolashvili, M. Ibrahimov, I. E. Papadakis, K. Tsinganos, Kunihiko Sadakane, N. Okada, L. O. Takalo, A. Sillanpää, G. Tosti, S. Ciprini, A. Frasca, E. Marilli, R. M. Robb, J. C. Noble, S. G. Jorstad, V. A. Hagen‐Thorn, V. M. Larionov, R. Nesci, M. Maesano, Richard D. Schwartz, J. Basler, P. W. Gorham, H. Iwamatsu, Takeo Kato, C. Pullen, E. Benítez, J. A. de Diego, Marko Moilanen, A. Oksanen, D. Rodriguez, A. C. Sadun, M. Kelly, M. T. Carini, H. R. Miller, S. Catalano, D. Dultzin‐Hacyan, J. H. Fan, Ryoko Ishioka, Hannu Karttunen, P. Keinänen, N. A. Kudryavtseva, M. Lainela, L. Lanteri, Е. Г. Ларионова, Katsura Matsumoto, J. R. Mattox, F. Montagni, G. Nucciarelli, L. Ostorero, J. Papamastorakis, M. Pasanen, G. Sobrito, Makoto Uemura

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCalifornia Institute of TechnologyJet Propulsion LaboratoryNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsBlazarLight curveFlux (metallurgy)BL Lac objectBrightnessAchromatic lensGalaxyVariation (astronomy)TelescopeAstronomyGamma ray

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present UBVRI light curves of BL Lacertae from May 2000 to January 2001, obtained by 24 telescopes in 11 countries. More than 15 000 observations were performed in that period, which was the extension of the Whole Earth Blazar Telescope (WEBT) campaign originally planned for July–August 2000. The exceptional sampling reached allows one to follow the flux behaviour in fine detail. Two different phases can be distinguished in the light curves: a first, relatively low-brightness phase is followed by an outburst phase, after a more than brightening in a few weeks. Both the time duration (about ) and the variation amplitude (roughly ) are similar in the two phases. Rapid flux oscillations are present all the time, involving variations up to a few tenths of mag on hour time scales, and witnessing an intense intraday activity of this source. In particular, a half-mag brightness decrease in about was detected on August 8–9, 2000, immediately followed by a ~ brightening in . Colour indexes have been derived by coupling the highest precision B and R data taken by the same instrument within and after subtracting the host galaxy contribution from the fluxes. The 620 indexes obtained show that the optical spectrum is weakly sensitive to the long-term trend, while it strictly follows the short-term flux behaviour, becoming bluer when the brightness increases. Thus, spectral changes are not related to the host galaxy contribution, but they are an intrinsic feature of fast flares. We suggest that the achromatic mechanism causing the long-term flux base-level modulation can be envisaged in a variation of the relativistic Doppler beaming factor, and that this variation is likely due to a change of the viewing angle. Discrete correlation function (DCF) analysis reveals the existence of a characteristic time scale of variability of ~ in the light curve of the core WEBT campaign, while no measurable time delay between variations in the B and R bands is found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it