Clinical trial: randomized controlled study of zidovudine and lamivudine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis stabilized on ursodiol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A human betaretrovirus has been characterized in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Uncontrolled studies using combination anti-retroviral therapy have reported significant biochemical and histological improvement. AIM: To conduct a double blind, randomized controlled trial as a proof of principal to link infection with PBC. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with an alkaline phosphatase level>1.5 upper limits of normal stabilized on ursodeoxycholic acid therapy were randomized to either 300 mg zidovudine and 150 mg lamivudine B.I.D. or placebo for 6 months. RESULTS: None of the patients normalized alkaline phosphatase and no significant differences were observed in normalizing serum aminotransferase levels. Significant differences were observed in the antiviral versus placebo arms with improvements in serial alkaline phosphatase (p<0.04), ALT (p<0.03) and AST (p<0.04) as well as clinical score (p<0.02). After 6 months, 25% of patients in the placebo arm and 4% in the antiviral arm had evidence of virus in serum. CONCLUSIONS: The study endpoints for normalizing hepatic biochemistry were too stringent to show efficacy for zidovudine and lamivudine therapy despite the demonstrable impact on clinical and biochemical improvement. Accordingly, more potent anti-viral regimens will be required to confirm the efficacy of antiviral therapy in PBC patients with human betaretrovirus infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".