MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103669589 · doi:10.1139/g2012-047

Molecular bases of the postzygotic barriers in interspecific crosses between the wild potato species<i>Solanum acaule</i>and<i>Solanum commersonii</i>

2012· article· en· W2103669589 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paula Cornejo, Elsa Lucila Camadro, Ricardo W. Masuelli

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto Nacional de Investigación AgropecuariaInstitut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsBiologyEndospermSolanumComplementary DNAGerminal vesicleGeneGeneticsPloidyBotanyMolecular biologyMeiosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To investigate the molecular bases of postzygotic hybridization barriers in tuber-bearing Solanums, the wild species Solanum commersonii Dunal ex Poir. (cmm, 2n = 2x = 24, 1EBN) and Solanum acaule Bitter (acl, 2n = 4x = 48, 2EBN) were crossed in intra- and interspecific genotypic combinations, and the transcriptome of immature seeds was analyzed by using the cDNA-AFLP technique. From a total of 423 analyzed cDNA fragments, 107 (25.3%) were differentially regulated in the compatible (acl × acl and cmm × cmm) versus incompatible (acl × cmm) crosses. DNA sequence data were obtained from 21 fragments and RT-PCR analyses were carried out with five fragments to validate the cDNA-AFLP differential pattern. Sequence analysis suggested a possible role for the differentially expressed sequences in cytokinesis, cell cycle, secondary and hormonal metabolism, biodegradation, and transport. In situ hybridization experiments with fragments encoding an ubiquitin-fold modifier 1 precursor and a possible vesicle transport protein revealed expression of these genes in the embryo and endosperm. The results suggest that the collapse of the embryo and endosperm in incompatible crosses may be related to alterations in cell cycle and cytokinesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207