Frequency of genomic rearrangements involving the SHFM3 locus at chromosome 10q24 in syndromic and non‐syndromic split‐hand/foot malformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Split-hand/foot malformation (SHFM), or ectrodactyly, is characterized by underdeveloped or absent central digital rays, clefts of the hands and feet, and variable syndactyly of the remaining digits. SHFM occurs as both an isolated finding and a component of many syndromes. SHFM is a heterogeneous condition caused by multiple loci, including SHFM1 (chromosome region 7q21-q22), SHFM2 (Xq26), SHFM3 (10q24), SHFM4 (3q27), and SHFM5 (2q31). Mutations in TP63 at the SHFM4 locus are known to underlie both syndromic and non-syndromic forms SHFM, but the causes of most non-syndromic SHFM cases remain unknown. The recent identification of submicroscopic tandem chromosome duplications affecting the SHFM3 locus in seven families with non-syndromic SHFM has helped to further unravel the molecular basis of this malformation. In our ongoing studies of the SHFM3 locus in 44 additional cases of syndromic and non-syndromic SHFM, we have identified similar chromosome rearrangements in eight additional cases (18%), using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). We have also utilized real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) to test for the duplications. Seven of the cases with rearrangements were non-syndromic. The current findings bring the total of SHFM3-associated cases with chromosome rearrangements to 15, which constitute 29% (15 of 51) of the cases screened to date. This includes 9 of 9 cases (100%) with known linkage to the SHFM3 locus, all of whom have non-syndromic SHFM, and 6 of 42 additional cases (14%), four of whom have non-syndromic SHFM. Thus, SHFM3 abnormalities underlie a substantial proportion of SHFM cases and appear to be a more frequent cause of non-syndromic SHFM than mutations in TP63.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".