Process for the synthesis of symmetric and unsymmetric oxygen bridged dimers of boron subphthalocyanines (μ-oxo-(BsubPc)<sub>2</sub>s)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A process for the gram scale synthesis of the oxygen bridged dimer of boron subphthalocyanine, μ-oxo-(BsubPc)2, has been developed. During the development it was found that a wide range of reaction pathways under diverse conditions lead to μ-oxo-(BsubPc)2 formation. However, obtaining μ-oxo-(BsubPc)2 as the main reaction product in appreciable yields and its subsequent isolation were extremely challenging. The best balance of purity, yield and conversion was achieved with a time controlled reaction of an equimolar reaction of HO-BsubPc with Br-BsubPc in the presence of K3PO4. The purification involved sequentially Soxhlet extraction, Kauffman column chromatography and train sublimation. We have repeated the process and yields ranged from 27 to 30% of pure, doubly-sublimed μ-oxo-(BsubPc)2. This process also enabled the synthesis of unsymmetric μ-oxo-(BsubPc)2s by reaction of HO-BsubPc with Br-F12BsubPc, Cl-Cl6BsubPc and Cl-Cl12BsubPc. After synthesis the solution-state properties of the unsymmetric μ-oxo-(BsubPc)2s were investigated, and compared to the symmetric μ-oxo-(BsubPc)2 and more broadly to other BsubPcs. The electronic properties of μ-oxo-(BsubPc)2 were found to differ from its unsymmetric counterparts, but were found to be similar to halo-BsubPcs. Furthermore, the photophysical properties of μ-oxo-(BsubPc)2, both symmetric and unsymmetric, differed greatly from all other known BsubPcs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".