Filosofía, intertextualidad y postmodernismo: la influencia de Friedrich Nietzsche en la obra novelística y en la ensayística de Juan Benet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En la obra novelística y ensayística de Juan Benet se puede detectar numerosas intertextualidades del filósofo alemán Friedrich Nietzsche que no han sido todavía adecuadamente investigadas. Entre los temas nietzscheanos que penetran la obra de Benet, los más importantes son la defensa del irracionalismo como vía de conocimiento que ayuda a explicar mejor la naturaleza de lo real, la oposición a sistemas epistemológicos cerrados, la defensa del fragmentarismo, del nihilismo, del fatalismo, el sentido de lo trágico que está presente en sus obras y en sus personajes, la dialéctica entre apolíneos y dionisiacos, el eterno retorno, la parodia del superhombre, la presencia de un sujeto descentrado por la fatalidad y por la ruina, la voluntad de poder durante la Guerra Civil española, y la preponderancia del estilo sobre el argumento. Se ofrecerán numerosos ejemplos desde su obra regionata y desde su ensayo. In the novelistic and essayistic works of Juan Benet, one can detect numerous intertextualities of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche that have not yet been adequately researched. Among the Nietzschean themes in Benet, the most important are the defence of irrationalism as a way of knowledge that better explains the real, the opposition to closed epistemological systems, the defence of fragmentarism, nihilism, fatalism, the sense of tragedy that is present in his works and in his characters, the dialectic of the Apollonian and the Dionysian, the eternal return, the parody of the Superman, the presence of a subject decentered by fatality and ruin, the will to power during the Spanish Civil War, and the preponderance of style over plot. I will give many examples from Benet’s novels, above all those about Región, and from his essays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".