MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103714524 · doi:10.1109/pac.1993.309664

Longitudinal impedance of a prototype kicker magnet system

2002· article· en· W2103714524 on OpenAlexaff
H.J. Tran, Michael Barnes, G.D. Wait, Y. Yan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetPhysicsCoaxialElectrical impedanceElectrical engineeringNuclear magnetic resonanceInductorRise timeAcousticsVoltageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The longitudinal impedance of a kicker magnet system for the proposed KAON factory has been measured from 0.3 to 200 MHz. The measurement was done by transforming the kicker magnet under test into a coaxial line in order to measure the transmission parameter S/sub 21/ through the line. The measurement was performed in two frequency ranges. From 0.3 to 50 MHz the magnet was transformed into a 50 /spl Omega/ coaxial line, and from 45 to 200 MHz into a 180 /spl Omega/ coaxial line. Resonances in the longitudinal impedance spectrum are due to the electrical resonant modes of the kicker magnet system. The effect on the longitudinal impedance of a speed-up network and a saturating inductor, installed on the input to the kicker magnet to improve its kick performance, was determined. The speed-up network can damp some of the resonances whereas the saturating inductor can eliminate the resonances due to the input cable of the kicker magnet. Above 45 MHz where attenuation in the LC cells of the kicker magnet is strong, external components connected to the kicker magnet have negligible influence on the longitudinal impedance. Hence the longitudinal impedance spectrum of the kicker magnet in the 45 to 200 MHz frequency range does not depend on external components such as the speed-up network, the saturating inductor and the input and output cables.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics ResearchFrench-language works237,207