MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103759933 · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-1185

Expression of Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter-Transcription Factor II Enhances Invasiveness of Human Lung Carcinoma Cells

2004· article· en· W2103759933 on OpenAlexaff
Roya Navab, Juana Maria Gonzalez-Santos, Michael R. Johnston, Jiang Liu, Pnina Brodt, Ming‐Sound Tsao, Jim Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreRoyal Ottawa Mental Health CentreUniversity of TorontoRoyal Victoria HospitalSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCancer researchCarcinogenesisAngiogenesisExtracellular matrixTransfectionTranscription factorPlasminogen activatorMolecular biologyCell cultureCell biologyCancerEndocrinologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor II (COUP-TFII) plays an essential role in angiogenesis and development. It is differentially expressed in tumor cell lines, but its role in carcinogenesis is largely unknown. We demonstrate here that noninvasive human lung cancer cells become invasive when COUP-TFII was expressed. The expression of extracellular matrix degrading proteinases, such as matrix metalloproteinase 2 and urokinase-type plasminogen activator, was up-regulated in these cells. This finding was confirmed by transduction of different human lung cancer cell lines with COUP-TFII protein and also by using antisense expression. We observed disorganization of actin filaments and focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation in COUP-TFII-transfected human lung cancer cells in addition to the increase in extracellular metalloproteinase activity. These results suggest that COUP-TFII may be considered as a new target for anticancer therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsFrench-language works237,207