Tissue Distribution of Calcineurin and its Sensitivity to Inhibition by Cyclosporine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The immunosuppressive activity of cyclosporine is mediated by inhibiting calcineurin phosphatase. However, calcineurin is widely distributed in other tissues. We examined the degree of calcineurin inhibition by cyclosporine in various tissues. In vitro, the cyclosporine concentration inhibiting 50% (IC50) of calcineurin was to approximately 10 ng/mL in human and mouse leukocytes suspensions. In vitro and in vivo IC50s of cyclosporine in homogenates of mouse kidney, heart, liver, testis, and spleen were also comparable (9-48 ng/mL). The maximum calcineurin inhibition by cyclosporine varied, from 83 to 95% of calcineurin activity in spleen, kidney, liver, and testis to 60% in heart and only 10% in brain. Maximum calcineurin inhibition was increased by the addition of cyclophilin A, indicating that cyclophilin concentrations were limiting in some tissues, at least in this assay. Western analysis of mouse tissues showed significantly less cyclophilin in heart than other tissues. cyclosporine concentrations per weight of tissue protein were highest in kidney and liver and lowest in brain and testis after oral dosing, with intermediate levels in spleen, heart, and whole blood. Thus each cyclosporine dose produces rapid and wide-spread inhibition of calcineurin in tissues, with differences in total susceptibility of each tissue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".