Protamines: Structural Complexity, Evolution and Chromatin Patterning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite their relatively arginine-rich composition, protamines exhibit a high degree of structural variation. Indeed, the primary structure of these histone H1-related sperm nuclear basic proteins (SNBPs) is not random and is the depository of important phylogenetic information. This appears to be the result of their fast rate of evolution driven by positive selection. The way by which the protein variability participates in the transitions that lead to the final highly condensed chromatin organization of spermatozoa at the end of spermiogenesis is not clearly understood. In this paper we focus on the transient chromatin/nucleoplasm patterning that occurs in either a lamellar step or an inversion step during early and mid-spermiogenesis. This takes place in a small subset of protamines in internally fertilizing species of vertebrates, invertebrates and plants. It involves “complex” protamines that are processed, replaced, or undergo side chain modification (such as phosphorylation or disulfide bond formation) during the histone-to-protamine transition. Characteristic features of such patterning, as observed in TEM photomicrographs, include: constancy of the dominant pattern repeat distance λm despite dynamic changes in developmental morphology, bicontinuity of chromatin and nucleoplasm, and chromatin orientation either perpendicular or parallel to the nuclear envelope. This supports the hypothesis that liquid - liquid phase separation by the mechanism of spinodal decomposition may be occurring during spermiogenesis in these species. Spinodal decomposition involves long wave fluctuations of the local concentration with a low energy barrier and thus differs from the mechanism of nucleation and growth that is known to occur during spermiogenesis in internally fertilizing mammals. Keywords: Protamines, structure, evolution, chromatin/nucleoplasm patterning, lamellae, spermiogenesis, sperm nuclear basic proteins, LAMELLAR, spinodal decomposition, protamine SNBP type, HISTONE H1, ARGININE-RICH PROTAMINES, structural heterogeneity, phylogeny, SPERMATIDS, genome, keratinous protamines, thermal quenching, nucleation, PatchProtamines, structure, evolution, chromatin/nucleoplasm patterning, lamellae, spermiogenesis, sperm nuclear basic proteins, LAMELLAR, spinodal decomposition, protamine SNBP type, HISTONE H1, ARGININE-RICH PROTAMINES, structural heterogeneity, phylogeny, SPERMATIDS, genome, keratinous protamines, thermal quenching, nucleation, Patch
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".