MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103801952 · doi:10.1080/00365510701697390

Role of the fractalkine receptor CX3CR1 polymorphisms V249I and T280M as risk factors for early‐onset coronary artery disease in patients with no classic risk factors

2008· article· en· W2103801952 on OpenAlexafffund
B.A. Nassar, AA Nanji, Thomas Ransom, Kenneth Rockwood, Susan Kirkland, K. MacPherson, Philip W. Connelly, David E. Johnstone, Blair J. O’Neill, Iqbal Bata, Pantelis Andreou, Lawrence Title

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemokine receptors and signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of TorontoDalhousie University
FundersDalhousie Medical Research FoundationHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsInternal medicineApolipoprotein BCoronary artery diseaseMedicineMyocardial infarctionCX3CR1GastroenterologyCardiologyEndocrinologyRisk factorApolipoprotein EAlleleCholesterolChemokineDiseaseReceptorBiologyChemokine receptorGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: CX3CR1 is a monocyte chemokine receptor and adhesion molecule. Two CX3CR1 mutations, V249I and T280M, reportedly decrease coronary artery disease (CAD) risk independent of established risk factors. An I249 protective effect is attributed to reducing CX3CR1 binding to fractalkine, its ligand. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We examined the frequencies of V249I and T280M among early-onset CAD patients (G1; n = 149; <50 years), late-onset CAD patients (G2; n = 150; >65 years) and healthy controls (HC; n = 149, 47-93 years) without known CAD risk factors. We compared plasma total cholesterol (TC)/high density lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein B (APOB)/apolipoprotein AI (APOAI) ratios among the groups and mutation carriers and non-carriers, and the prevalence of the mutations in G1 and G2 patients with multiple coronary vessel disease (MVD) and myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: G1 patients had non-significantly lower frequencies of I249 versus (vs.) G2 or controls (G1; 51 %, G2: 61 %, controls: 58 %, p = 0.19), with no difference in T280M (p = 0.8). TC/HDL-C and APOB/APOAI ratios were significantly higher in G1 patients vs. G2 and controls (p<0.0001) independently of either mutation. More G2 patients had MVD than younger ones (p<0.0001); however, more G1 patients were homozygous for V249 compared to G2 patients, who more often had the I249 allele (p<0.02). There was no such association with T280M (p = 0.38). Although more G1 patients had MI, this was not mutation related. CONCLUSIONS: There were significantly higher lipid ratios in G1 compared to G2 and HC (G1>G2>HC), but not in mutation prevalence. I249 mutation was associated with MVD in older patients, while V249 homozygosity was associated with the early-onset CAD. Neither allele affected MI or lipid levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory InvestigationSame topicChemokine receptors and signalingFrench-language works237,207