MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103813895 · doi:10.1149/1.2795229

Cathodic Electrodeposition of Manganese Oxides for Electrochemical Supercapacitors

2007· article· en· W2103813895 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManganeseElectrophoretic depositionSupercapacitorCathodic protectionElectrochemistryMaterials scienceDeposition (geology)OxideElectrolyteInorganic chemistryManganese oxideNanoparticleChemical engineeringChemistryMetallurgyElectrodeNanotechnologyCoating

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manganese oxide films for electrochemical supercapacitors (ES) have been prepared by cathodic electrolytic and electrophoretic deposition. The cathodic reduction of KMnO4 solutions resulted in the formation of manganese oxide deposits. In another approach electrophoretic deposition (EPD) has been utilized for the deposition of manganese oxide nanoparticles prepared by a chemical precipitation method. The films exhibited pseudocapacitive behavior in a potential window of 0-1 V versus SCE in aqueous 0.5 M Na2SO4 and 0.5 M K2SO4 solutions. The deposition methods allowed the formation of porous films which exhibited a specific capacitance (SC) in the range of up to 240 F/g. The SC decreased with increasing scan rate. The films prepared by electrolytic deposition showed higher SC compared to the SC of EPD deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it