MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103813895 · doi:10.1149/1.2795229

Cathodic Electrodeposition of Manganese Oxides for Electrochemical Supercapacitors

2007· article· en· W2103813895 on OpenAlexaff
Janice Wei, Min Cheong, N. Nagarajan, Igor Zhitomirsky

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManganeseElectrophoretic depositionSupercapacitorCathodic protectionElectrochemistryMaterials scienceDeposition (geology)OxideElectrolyteInorganic chemistryManganese oxideNanoparticleChemical engineeringChemistryMetallurgyElectrodeNanotechnologyCoating

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manganese oxide films for electrochemical supercapacitors (ES) have been prepared by cathodic electrolytic and electrophoretic deposition. The cathodic reduction of KMnO4 solutions resulted in the formation of manganese oxide deposits. In another approach electrophoretic deposition (EPD) has been utilized for the deposition of manganese oxide nanoparticles prepared by a chemical precipitation method. The films exhibited pseudocapacitive behavior in a potential window of 0-1 V versus SCE in aqueous 0.5 M Na2SO4 and 0.5 M K2SO4 solutions. The deposition methods allowed the formation of porous films which exhibited a specific capacitance (SC) in the range of up to 240 F/g. The SC decreased with increasing scan rate. The films prepared by electrolytic deposition showed higher SC compared to the SC of EPD deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationFrench-language works237,207