Effect of the Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction on Rigid Transmission Line Towers Subjected to Wind and Impulse Loads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transmission lines (TL) towers are traditionally analyzed assuming fixed base. However, this assumption is questionable as foundation is not rigid in most cases. In other fields, such as seismic engineering, it has been reported in the past that the foundation stiffness and damping affects the structural behavior while in interaction with the structure specifically under dynamic loads. In this paper, the soil-structure interaction (SSI) effect on transmission line (TL) behavior is studied. The soil is replaced by foundation impedance, a set of frequency dependent spring and dashpot. For this purpose, a parametric study on a simplified case is presented for two types of dynamic loads: wind load and impulse load supposed to represent the effect of the shock wake following the breakage of a conductor of ground wire. To complement this parametric study, a real case is used in the analysis. The behaviour of the foundation is determined with software FLAC with its foundation impedance. Two types of soil are used in the analysis: (i) cohesive soil; (ii) granular soil. The paper confirms that foundations can modify structural behaviour significantly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".