Oxidative Stress and Respiratory Muscle Dysfunction in Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: Oxidative stress is involved in the skeletal muscle dysfunction observed in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We hypothesized that the diaphragms of such patients might generate greater levels of oxidants than those neutralized by antioxidants. OBJECTIVES: To assess the levels of both oxidative and nitrosative stress and different antioxidants in the diaphragms of those patients, and to analyze potential relationships with lung and respiratory muscle dysfunctions. METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a case-control study in which reactive carbonyl groups, hydroxynonenal-protein adducts, antioxidant enzyme levels, nitric oxide synthases, and 3-nitrotyrosine formation were detected using immunoblotting and immunhistochemistry in diaphragm specimens (thoracotomy) obtained from six patients with severe COPD, six patients with moderate COPD, and seven control subjects. MAIN RESULTS: Diaphragms of patients with severe COPD showed both higher protein carbonyl groups and hydroxynonenal-protein adducts than control subjects. When only considering patients with COPD, negative correlations were found between carbonyl groups and airway obstruction, and between hydroxynonenal-protein adducts and respiratory muscle strength. Although diaphragmatic neuronal nitric oxide synthase did not differ among the three groups and no inducible nitric oxide synthase was detected in any muscle, muscle endothelial nitric oxide synthase was lower in patients with severe COPD than in control subjects. Muscle nitrotyrosine levels were similar in both patients with severe COPD and control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that oxidative stress rather than nitric oxide is likely to be involved in the respiratory muscle dysfunction in severe COPD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".