MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104034787 · doi:10.1513/pats.2306009

Revisiting Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Structure and Function

2004· review· en· W2104034787 on OpenAlexaff
John W. Hanrahan

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Thoracic Society · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorGatingATP-binding cassette transporterCystic fibrosisChloride channelATP hydrolysisCell biologyTransporterCyclic nucleotide-binding domainTransmembrane proteinBiochemistryRegulatorNucleotideChemistryBiophysicsBiologyATPaseEnzymeReceptorGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is a channel/enzyme which mediates passive diffusion of chloride and bicarbonate through epithelial cell membranes. It is expressed in many cell types throughout the body, but in the airways it is found mainly in secretory serous cells of the submucosal glands. CFTR belongs to a large super-family of ATP binding cassette transporters that have two nucleotide binding domains with characteristic sequences or "motifs". Although most other ATP binding cassette transporters consume ATP to actively transport various substrates, in CFTR the interactions of ATP with nucleotide binding domains control opening and closing of the channel pore (i.e., channel gating). Recent high resolution structures of bacterial nucleotide binding domains combined with new biochemical and electrophysiological studies of CFTR itself have led to major advances in our understanding of CFTR gating. For example, it is now clear that the ATPase activity of CFTR is not strictly required for its channel activity. CFTR has at least two distinct gating modes; one dependent on hydrolysis and the other requiring only stable ATP binding. In this article we discuss a working hypothesis for CFTR that incorporates these recent findings and discuss some interesting implications of the paradigm shift for other aspects of CFTR function and dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207