Analysis and design of LCC resonant inverter for the tranportation systems applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The analysis and design of an LCC-type power resonant inverter for transportation application in a train system is presented in this paper. The inverter powers the linear induction motor (LIM) used in urban transit applications. It has low components stresses compared with the conventional series and series-parallel resonant topologies. The voltage regulation is achieved by using a self-oscillating controller that results in high power efficiency for wide range of current motor operation. Moreover, by using an optimized transformer leakage inductance value, Zero-Current Zero-Voltage (ZCZVS) operation is achieved for the primary-side IGBTs, which allows for high switching frequency operation with lower power losses, resulting in increased power density. The ZCZVS operation is achieved without using an auxiliary circuit by utilizing the switches capacitances and the transformer leakage inductance. The paper presents the theoretical analysis, which is used in the design of the power inverter. Experimental results based on 750 Vdc/700 Vac 400 kW design are presented to verify and evaluate the LCC-type resonant inverter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".