Body weight is modulated by levels of full-length Huntingtin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Huntington disease is an adult-onset neurodegenerative disorder that is caused by the expansion of a polyglutamine tract within the Huntingtin (htt) protein. Wild-type htt has been shown to be involved in transcription, transport and cell survival. Here, we demonstrate that increased expression of full-length wild-type htt in mice is associated with a dose-dependent increase in body weight which results from an increase in both total fat mass and fat-free mass. Conversely, we show that a reduction in the levels of wild-type htt is associated with decreased body weight. Examination of individual organ weights revealed that the weight of the heart, liver, kidneys, lungs and spleen increased with the over-expression of wild-type htt, whereas the brain and testis were unaltered. On the basis of these initial findings, we examined mice that over-express full-length mutant htt to determine the effect of polyglutamine expansion on this novel function of wild-type htt. We found that over-expression of full-length mutant htt, but not an N-terminal fragment of mutant htt, also increased body weight and organ weight, except in the brain and testis where mutant htt appears to be toxic. In these mice, the majority of weight gain could be accounted for by increases in total fat mass. Further investigation of the weight gain phenotype revealed that the increases in weight were not accounted for by increased food consumption relative to body weight. Overall, we demonstrate that increased levels of both wild-type and mutant full-length htt are associated with increased body weight.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".