Testosterone challenge and androgen receptor activity in relation to <scp>UGT</scp>2B17 genotypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated the androgen receptor (AR) bioluminescense response in serum and urine before and after testosterone challenge in different genotypes of the UGT2B17 enzyme, which catalyses testosterone glucuronidation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The androgen receptor activity was determined using a yeast-based bioluminescence assay. The androgens were analysed using LC-MS/MS, and the individuals were genotyped for UGT2B17 deletion polymorphism using real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The serum concentrations of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) were markedly elevated on days 2 and 4 and were still above baseline on day 15 after a dose of 500 mg testosterone enanthate. The androgenic activity in serum increased in parallel and correlated with the hormone concentrations and remained above baseline on day 15. The urinary androgenic activity increased 4-5-fold and was closely related to the unconjugated testosterone and independent of the UGT2B17 genotype. CONCLUSIONS: The AR assay may serve as a complement to the urinary testosterone/epitestosterone (T/E) doping test, because this is profoundly influenced by the UGT2B17 deletion polymorphism. It may also be useful for detection of other illicit androgens in sports, or in the society, or for monitoring and diagnostics of androgen-related disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".