Gain control via feedforward inhibition in noisy and delayed neural circuits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The control and scaling of the input-output behavior of neural networks, or gain control, is one of the main strategies used by neural systems for the processing and gating of information. This input-output behavior is often described by the so-called f-I curve, which shows the output firing rate as a function of the input current to the neuron or neural circuit [1]. In particular, the slope of such a dependency constitutes a useful marker of the behavior of the neuron. If the slope of the f-I curve is high, small changes in the input current will be mapped by the cell into large changes in the output firing rate, which implies an increasing of the sensitivity of the neuron to weak stimuli. On the other hand, a small slope of the f-I curve translates large changes in the input current to small changes in the output firing rate, allowing the neuron to encode a broad range of stimulus intensities into a narrow range of firing rates. Several gain control behaviors have been found to be particularly relevant for the gating and transformation of information in neural circuits. For instance, common biological mechanisms have been found to produce subtractive effects in the f-I curve [2], while a few others are thought to induce divisive (i.e. changes in the slope of the f-I curve)or other nonlinear effects [2-4]. However, a common mechanism able to induce these three broad classes of gain control has not been described up to date. We present here (see [5] for further details) a study of gain control in a feedforward neural circuit inspired by the electrosensory lateral-line lobe of weakly electric fish. Our model displays three different gain control regimes: subtractive, divisive and non-monotonic. The neural circuit can shift from one regime to the other by a simple modulation of the synaptic strength of the inhibitory feedforward pathway present in the circuit, which, in the electrosensory circuit used as example, is known to present long-term synaptic plasticity mechanisms. To our knowledge, this is the first example of a network which presents all these gain controls at once. We further study the effect of noise and delays on this gain control mechanism, showing in particular that delays in the feedforward inhibitory pathway linearize the input-to-output relationship of the network, acting as an extra source of noise in this sense. Finally, using physiological evidences, we apply our model to the case of the divisive gain control observed in vivo in weakly electric fish. Our work illustrates how subtractive, divisive and non-monotonic gain control may be obtained in inhibitory feedforward neural circuits. In addition, the analysis of the conditions in which the f-I response curve of superficial pyramidal neurons becomes non-monotonic reveals a novel nonlinear gain control mechanism which agrees with in vitro experimental recordings in the electric fish [6].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".